SHAPE FOR TRACKING PROGRESS AGAINST THE SCHEDULE
Keep your schedule up-to-date
without chasing down site teams
Skip the manual check-ins. Get accurate, evidence-backed progress updates, all linked to your schedule.

LEADING CONTRACTORS USE SHAPE TO TRACK PROGRESS AGAINST THE SCHEDULE
THE PROBLEM IS...
Getting schedule updates requires too much effort
Manual coordination eats up hours
Chasing people down for updates, marking up schedule printouts, compiling spreadsheets. Simple updates take time-consuming coordination.
Updates lack detail or evidence
Someone says an activity is 50% complete. Without photos or details about what was accomplished, you can't verify if it's accurate.
There’s double handling of information
Daily reports. Then spreadsheets. Then scheduling software. Information gets double-handled because nothing connects.
Guarantee timely progress updates from site
Skip the forms. Capture records from site chats.
Your site teams communicate, log progress, and raise issues through a simple messaging app. All conversations, photos, issues, and progress updates automatically get structured into your project records in real-time.

See who’s capturing quality records and who isn’t
See exactly who's logging progress and who needs coaching. Each record gets a completeness score, so you can see gaps at a glance and flag the right people, without reviewing every individual progress log.

Keep the schedule updated without manual data entry
Pull activities directly from your scheduling software into Shape.

Export updated progress back to your schedule each week.

Stay on top of schedule without the manual work
See how contractors get accurate progress from site and maintain control over schedule without the time-consuming manual coordination.
More ways Shape helps with other critical project challenges
Frequently Asked Questions
No. Shape works alongside P6, MS Project, Asta, or whatever you use for scheduling. You import activities into Shape at the start of the week, site teams update progress throughout the week, then you export that progress back to your master schedule. Shape bridges the gap between your schedule and the field. It doesn't replace your scheduling tools.
Site teams don't see this as "one more system." They're using tools that make their daily work easier, with simple daily reports that pre-fill from yesterday, quick issue logging on their phone, messaging like WhatsApp that logs site records. Progress capture is built into these workflows, not a separate task.You also get visibility into who's using it and who isn't. The record quality monitor shows exactly who's submitting detailed reports and who needs coaching. You can address adoption issues immediately, not months later when you realise you're missing data.
Most daily reports exist separately from your schedule. Someone still needs to extract information and manually update the schedule. Shape connects them directly. Site teams report against actual schedule activities, and you export that progress straight to P6 or MS Project. No re-entering information, no manual transfers between systems.
The other key difference is detail. Traditional reports might say "worked on drainage," but Shape captures which activities progressed, by how much, with photos of the work, and what resources it took. It's detailed enough to actually update your schedule with confidence.
You also see who's reporting and who isn't. The record quality monitor flags incomplete reports immediately, so you can address gaps before they become problems. If someone consistently reports without detail or photos, you'll know right away.
Progress comes directly from the people doing the work, captured as it happens. Site teams report what they accomplished today with photos as proof. When someone logs 50% progress on an activity, there are photos of the completed work, timestamps showing when it was done, and details about what was accomplished.
You also see who's reporting and who isn't. The record quality monitor flags incomplete reports immediately, so you can address gaps before they become problems. If someone consistently reports without detail or photos, you'll know right away.
You have evidence-backed progress data, not just percentages. When you report that activities are on track or behind, you can show photos of completed work, explain what caused delays with timestamped records, and demonstrate exactly what resources were allocated. Reports look professional and substantive instead of vague status updates.
You can also export progress data to create visual reports or update formal project dashboards. The information is structured and ready to use, not scattered across emails and verbal updates.
Every progress update includes completion percentage, photos, date captured, and who logged it. Shift reports add more context: resource allocations (who worked on what for how many hours), materials used, downtime events with explanations, and any issues blocking progress.
You can drill into any activity to see its complete history: every progress log, every photo, every daily report mention, and every resource allocation over time. It's detailed enough to understand not just how much progress was made, but what it took to get there.

















